Javier Barranco Cosano vs Reda Bennani Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Jul at 03:36 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Barranco Cosano vs R. Bennani

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win

MAR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Cosano 1 - 0 Bennani
They have played 2 sets in total, with Javier Barranco Cosano winning 2 and Reda Bennani winning 0. The last match between Javier Barranco Cosano and Reda Bennani was at the M25 Denia, 25-07-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Javier Barranco Cosano getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cosano | 1 |
| Bennani | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M25 Denia(07-25-25)
J. B. Cosano vs R. Bennani H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $107,105 | Career Prize Money | $3,020 |
| 60.38% (378-248) | Career Total W/L | 60.94% (39-25) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 17 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. B. Cosano vs R. Bennani Match Preview:
- Bennani has shown slightly better prowess on their second serve in recent matches, winning 46.61% of points compared to Cosano's 43.36%. Could this give Bennani an edge?
- Cosano excels in returning second serves, winning 48.9% of these points compared to Bennani's 45.23%.
- Bennani has the upper hand when returning first serves, with a 36.71% success rate against Cosano's 28.92%.
- In pressure situations, Bennani shines, saving 57.87% of breakpoints, while Cosano saves 51.83%.
- Bennani has a superior win rate over the past year, securing victory in 67.86% of matches, whereas Cosano won 43.18%.
- Cosano's best performance is on clay with a 61% win rate, but Bennani is strongest on hard surfaces, with a 67% win rate.
- Their match experience differs, with Cosano primarily competing in Challenger/ITF tours and Bennani in Futures/Satellites/ITF tours.
- In direct head-to-head contests, Cosano has triumphed in their sole encounter, winning 2-0 in sets.
- Cosano has faced stronger opponents, with an average opponent rank of 281.36, compared to Bennani's 424.82.
- For deciding sets over the last year, Bennani has fared better, winning 56% compared to Cosano's 31%.
- When converting break points, Bennani again leads, capitalizing on 41.67% of opportunities, while Cosano converts 35.77%.
Editorial Prediction (July 25, 2025, UTC):
As Cosano and Bennani prepare to face off, there are several factors to consider in predicting the outcome. Bennani's performance on second serves and their ability to return first serves proficiently give them a slight conceptual advantage going into this match. Moreover, Bennani's ability to manage high-pressure situations, as indicated by their successful breakpoint saving rate, suggests resilience during crucial match moments.
Cosano, however, has a commendable record of winning against higher-ranked opponents, suggesting a potential to elevate performance against tougher adversaries. They also have supremacy in the only direct encounter between the two, giving them a psychological edge.
Considering these statistics and past performances, while Bennani shows potential due to effective serving and handling pressure, Cosano's win in their direct encounter might indicate an upper hand on clay. Therefore, although the match might be closely contested, Cosano is more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming clash.
Javier Barranco Cosano vs Reda Bennani Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. B. Cosano vs R. Bennani H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:33:41 | Average Match Time | 1:33:41 |
| 65% (35/54) | 1st Serve % | 67% (36/54) |
| 71% (25/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (15/36) |
| 47% (9/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (7/18) |
| 38% (6/16) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 59% (32/54) | Return Points Win % | 37% (20/54) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. B. Cosano Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-1 4-6 7-6(2) | ||
R. Bennani Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | W | 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | ||
QF | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||

J. B. Cosano vs R. Bennani Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.38% (378/248) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.94% (39/25) |
| 58.39% (839/598) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.14% (86/57) |
| 53.41% (7112/6205) | Games Win/Loss | 51.80% (689/641) |
| 53.70% (29/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 61.52% (339/212) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.34% (35/23) |
| 47.37% (9/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 1030 | Aces Total | 59 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1565 | Total Double Faults | 105 |
| 1:34:22 | Average Match Time | 1:49:6 |
| 452.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 347.5 |
| 65% (25028/38436) | 1st Serve % | 71% (2988/4233) |
| 64% (16024/25028) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (1808/2988) |
| 48% (6482/13408) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (639/1245) |
| 46% (2071/4534) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (225/492) |
| 44% (17034/39033) | Return Points Win % | 43% (1866/4311) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 47.26% (112/125) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 69.21% (263/117) | Futures W/L | 63.33% (38/22) |
| 60% (366/609) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (37/62) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 55% (81/148) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 84% (16/19) |
| 53% (102/194) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (6/15) |
| 87% (368/321) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (39/36) |
| 13% (368/47) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (39/3) |
| 22% (258/56) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (25/3) |